Distributing since 1889 • Employee Owned for Better Service
Your 1st Choice!
Sign In
Quick Search:
Cart
|
My Account
|
Print
Ordering
Advanced Search
Fast Order Entry
Express Order Entry
Can't Find Title?
Shopping Cart
Lists
New Receipts
Recall Information
Forthcoming Titles
Latest Price Changes
Downloads
About Us
Home Page
About Matthews
Return Policy
New Account Application
Publisher List
McCoy Medical
Med-Book
Contact Us
Job Opportunities
FAQ
Terms of Use
Product Detail
NOTICE: This is the ProQuest Ebook Central� format of this title.
What is ProQuest Ebook Central�?
Other formats:
Hardcover
All Formats
Animal Welfare: Competing Conceptions and Their Ethical Implications
Haynes, Richard P.
Pricing & Availability
Available: Yes*
This title does not qualify for any discount.
Email this title to a friend
Printer friendly version
Other formats:
Hardcover
All Formats
Book Information
Edition:
1st
Publisher:
Springer Nature
ISBN:
1-4020-8619-9 (1402086199)
ISBN-13:
978-1-4020-8619-9 (9781402086199)
Binding:
E E Book + ProQuest Ebook Central
Copyright:
2008
Publish Date:
09/08
Weight:
0.00 Lbs.
Subject Class:
SCI (Medical Science and Research)
Return Policy:
Non-Returnable.
Table Of Contents:
View
ProQuest Ebook Central�:
Please sign in to preview this title
Class Specifications
Discipline:
Clinical Path
Subject Definition:
Animal Welfare: Ethical Theory; Animal Rights
NLM Class:
QY 54
LC Class:
QL55
Abstract:
Members of the "animal welfare science community", which includes both scientists and philosophers, have illegitimately appropriated the concept of animal welfare by claiming to have given a scientific account of it that is more objectively valid than the more "sentimental" account given by animal liberationists. This strategy has been used to argue for merely limited reform in the use of animals. This strategy was initially employed as a way of "sympathetically" responding to the abolitionist claims of anti-vivisectionists, who objected to the use of animals in research. It was subsequently used by farm animal scientists. The primarily reformist (as opposed to abolitionist) goals of this community make the false assumption that there are conditions under which animals may be raised and slaughtered for food or used as models in scientific research that are ethically acceptable. The tendency of the animal welfare science community is to accept this assumption as their framework of inquiry, and thus to discount certain practices as harmful to the interests of the animals that they affect. For example, animal welfare is conceptualized is such a way that death does not count as harmful to the interests of animal, nor prolonged life a benefit.
* Subject to ProQuest Ebook Central� availability
Follow Matthews Book Co. on:
Copyright © 2001-2024 Matthews Book Company - All rights reserved. - 11559 Rock Island Ct., Maryland Heights, MO, 63043 - (800) MED-BOOK
Matthews
Privacy Statement